THE ABC OF DIVORCE PROCEDURES IN NIGERIA: SEPARATING MYTH FROM REALITY
DIVORCE IN NIGERIA:
A Comprehensive Legal Guide for All
Readers
By Dada, Olumide Olunuyiwa, LLB, ACIPM, HRPL, LLM
Candidate
ABSTRACT
Divorce
in Nigeria operates at the intersection of statutory law, customary law, and
Islamic personal law. This article provides a comprehensive and accessible
guide to the legal grounds, procedural steps, and judicial interpretations
governing divorce in Nigeria. Drawing on relevant case law including
decisions of the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, and High Courts the article
examines each recognised form of marriage and the corresponding dissolution
procedure. It also addresses the rights of spouses regarding child custody,
property division, and maintenance, while debunking prevalent myths. The
article concludes with a call for legislative reform to better protect the
rights of women and children.
1. Introduction
Somewhere in Nigeria
today, a man or woman is sitting across from a lawyer, wondering how after
years of hoping things would get better they can finally, legally, walk free.
Divorce the legal
dissolution of a marriage is one of the most consequential legal events in a
person's life. Beyond its emotional dimensions, it carries significant legal
implications for property, children, finances, and social standing. In Nigeria,
divorce is not a simple or uniform process. It is shaped by at least three
distinct legal regimes: statutory law (principally the Matrimonial Causes Act,
Cap. M7, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004), customary law (which varies
across the country's many ethnic groups), and Islamic personal law (governed by
the principles of Sharia).
The Nigerian courts have,
over the decades, developed a rich body of case law that clarifies how these
regimes operate in practice. Yet, many Nigerians particularly those without
legal training remain unaware of their rights and obligations when a marriage
breaks down. This article aims to bridge that gap: it is written for the
general public and the legal professional alike, presenting a clear, accurate,
and well-referenced account of divorce law in Nigeria.
2. What is Divorce?
In simple terms, divorce
is the formal legal process by which a valid marriage is brought to an end. It
is important to note that in Nigerian law, not every form of cohabitation or
customary union constitutes a marriage for the purpose of divorce proceedings.
The type of marriage contracted determines the law applicable to its
dissolution and the court with jurisdiction to grant the divorce.
The principal statutory
instrument governing divorce in Nigeria is the Matrimonial Causes Act.
The Act applies exclusively to statutory (court) marriages conducted under the Marriage
Act, Cap. M6, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004. Customary marriages contracted
under the traditions of Nigeria's many ethnic communities — are governed by customary
law and dissolved through Customary Courts. Islamic marriages are dissolved
under Islamic personal law.
A crucial point often
misunderstood is that informal separation, however long it may last, does not
amount to a legal divorce. As the Court of Appeal affirmed in Ekanem v.
Ekanem [2010] LPELR-4063(CA), a marriage subsists until a court of
competent jurisdiction formally dissolves it. Parties who simply walk away from
a marriage without obtaining a court order remain legally married and cannot
validly contract a new statutory marriage.
3. Legal Grounds for Divorce Under the
Matrimonial Causes Act
The Matrimonial Causes Act
establishes a single, overarching ground for divorce: the irretrievable
breakdown of the marriage. This is not a ground in itself but a conclusion
the court reaches after finding that one or more of the statutory facts
enumerated in Section 15(2) of the Act have been established. In other words, a
petitioner cannot simply allege that the marriage has broken down — they must
point to a specific statutory fact that demonstrates the breakdown.
The Supreme Court has
consistently emphasised this point. In Musa v. Musa [1998] 8 NWLR (Pt. 560)
108, the court reiterated that the petitioner bears the burden of proving
at least one of the facts listed under Section 15(2), and that the court must
be satisfied that the marriage has truly and irretrievably broken down.
The recognised statutory
facts are examined below.
3.1 Wilful and Persistent Refusal to Consummate
the Marriage
Under Section 15(2)(a) of
the Matrimonial Causes Act, a petitioner may rely on the respondent's wilful
and persistent refusal to consummate the marriage. Consummation refers to the
first act of sexual intercourse following the marriage ceremony. The refusal
must be wilful that is,
deliberate and without lawful justification and it must be persistent,
meaning it is not an isolated incident.
In Nwachi v. Nwachi
[1995] 9 NWLR (Pt. 421) 471, the court held that a single refusal or a
temporary state of incapacity does not meet the statutory threshold. The
petitioner must demonstrate a continuing and deliberate pattern of refusal.
Medical evidence is often critical in distinguishing wilful refusal from
physical incapacity.
3.2 Adultery
Adultery voluntary sexual
intercourse between a married person and someone other than their spouse is
provided for in Section 15(2)(b) of the Act. Crucially, the statute requires
not only that adultery be proven, but also that the petitioner finds it intolerable
to live with the respondent.
In Owusu v. Owusu
[2000] 9 NWLR (Pt. 672) 232, the Court of Appeal affirmed that
intolerability is a subjective test: the court assesses whether this particular
petitioner, having regard to their circumstances, finds continued cohabitation
intolerable. Mere proof of adultery without the element of intolerability will
not suffice.
A common misconception is
that only a wife can petition on grounds of adultery, or that a husband's
adultery is more legally significant than a wife's. This is incorrect. Section
15(2)(b) applies equally to both spouses, and adultery by either party can
found a petition.
3.3 Unreasonable Behaviour
Under Section 15(2)(c), a
petitioner may allege that the respondent has behaved in such a way that the
petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with them. This is sometimes
loosely (though not entirely accurately) referred to as "cruelty." It
encompasses a broad range of conduct including physical violence, emotional
abuse, financial recklessness, and persistent humiliation.
The Court of Appeal, in Okafor
v. Okafor [2007] All FWLR (Pt. 391) 1497, confirmed that the test is an
objective one: would a reasonable person, having regard to all the circumstances
and the characters of the parties, find it unreasonable to continue living with
the respondent? The court also clarified that isolated incidents of bad conduct
may not suffice; a pattern of behaviour is generally required.
Importantly, unreasonable
behaviour is not confined to physical abuse. Persistent emotional neglect,
financial sabotage, and even severe addiction have been accepted by courts in
comparable jurisdictions and are increasingly recognised in Nigerian
jurisprudence.
3.4 Desertion
Section 15(2)(d) provides
that the respondent's desertion of the petitioner for a continuous period of at
least one year immediately preceding the petition may serve as a statutory
fact. Desertion requires four elements: (i) the fact of separation; (ii) the
intention on the part of the deserting spouse to remain apart; (iii) absence of
consent by the deserted spouse; and (iv) absence of just cause for the
departure.
In Ejike v. Ejike
[1999] 9 NWLR (Pt. 620) 590, the Court of Appeal observed that constructive
desertion — where one spouse's conduct is so unreasonable that the other is
effectively driven out of the matrimonial home — is also recognised. The spouse
who leaves in such circumstances is not the deserter; the one whose conduct
caused the departure is.
3.5 Separation
Sections 15(2)(e) and (f)
provide for separation as a statutory fact. If parties have lived apart for a
continuous period of at least two years and the respondent consents to the
divorce, or for a continuous period of at least three years (regardless of
consent), this may found a petition. The critical question is what constitutes
"living apart."
In Sotomi v. Sotomi
[1976] FNLR 215, the court held that "living apart" is not merely
a physical concept but also an emotional one: parties who share the same roof
but lead completely separate lives with no matrimonial relationship may be
treated as living apart for the purposes of the statute.
3.6 Other Statutory Facts
The Act also recognises a
number of other facts including: (i) the respondent's conviction and
imprisonment for an offence; (ii) habitual drunkenness or drug addiction; (iii)
the respondent's engagement in homosexual acts after the marriage; and (iv)
prolonged absence giving rise to a presumption of death. These grounds are less
commonly relied upon but remain part of the statutory landscape.
4. Procedural Steps for Obtaining a Divorce
The procedure for
obtaining a divorce in Nigeria under the Matrimonial Causes Act is governed by
the Matrimonial Causes Rules. The process unfolds in the following stages.
4.1 Filing a Petition
The spouse initiating the
divorce known as the petitioner commences proceedings by filing a
Petition for Dissolution of Marriage at the High Court of a State in which
either party is domiciled or ordinarily resident. The petition must set out the
statutory fact(s) relied upon, the relief sought, and particulars of any
children of the marriage.
It is a fundamental
principle of Nigerian matrimonial law that only the High Court has jurisdiction
to dissolve a statutory marriage. In Afolabi v. Afolabi [1988]
LPELR-3629(SC), the Supreme Court confirmed that a Magistrate Court or any
inferior court lacks the competence to entertain a petition for dissolution of
a statutory marriage. Any purported dissolution by such a court is a nullity.
4.2 Service of Process
Once the petition is
filed, it must be served on the respondent the other spouse in
accordance with the Rules. Proper service is a fundamental requirement of
natural justice, as confirmed by the Court of Appeal in Iyasere v. Iyasere
[2005] LPELR-6930(CA). A divorce obtained without proper service on the
respondent may be set aside.
4.3 Trial and Evidence
Both parties have the
opportunity to file responses, call witnesses, and present evidence. The
petitioner bears the initial burden of proof, but this may shift depending on
the respondent's pleadings. The court may also order mediation or conciliation,
especially where there are children involved.
4.4 Decree Nisi and Decree Absolute
If the court is satisfied
that the marriage has irretrievably broken down and that all procedural
requirements have been met, it pronounces a decree nisi — a conditional
order of divorce. The decree nisi becomes a decree absolute (the final
order that actually dissolves the marriage) after a period stipulated in the
Rules, provided no appeal is pending and the court has addressed all ancillary
matters, including custody and property.
5. Types of Divorce in Nigeria
5.1 Statutory Divorce
As discussed, statutory
divorce is governed by the Matrimonial Causes Act and is available only to
parties who contracted a statutory (court) marriage. The proceedings must be
initiated in the High Court, and the court has wide powers to make ancillary
orders on custody, maintenance, and property.
5.2 Customary Law Divorce
Nigeria's customary law is
not uniform — it varies from one ethnic community to another. However, most
systems of customary law recognise that a marriage may be dissolved either by
consent of the families or by a judicial process. The Customary Court in the
area where the marriage was contracted has jurisdiction to dissolve customary
law marriages.
A distinctive feature of
customary law divorce is the role of the bride price. In many
communities, the repayment of all or part of the bride price is considered a
precondition for a valid customary divorce. However, the courts have been clear
that this requirement cannot operate as a permanent bar to divorce. In the
landmark case of Alabi v. Alabi [1956] WRNLR 79, the court held that
where a wife sincerely wishes to end the marriage, the non-repayment of bride
price — though relevant — does not indefinitely prevent the dissolution of the
marriage.
In Thomas v. Thomas
[1941] 7 WACA 62, the West African Court of Appeal observed that customary
divorce procedures, while rooted in communal and family consensus, must
ultimately yield to the principle that no person should be permanently trapped
in a marriage against their will.
5.3 Non-Judicial Customary Divorce
In some communities, a
customary marriage may be dissolved without recourse to any court. The typical
process involves: (a) the wife informing her own family of her wish to end the
marriage; (b) the wife's family engaging in discussions with the husband's
family; (c) agreement on the repayment of the bride price and associated
marriage expenses; and (d) the actual repayment, which formally signifies the
dissolution.
It must be emphasised,
however, that such non-judicial dissolution is only available for customary
marriages. A statutory marriage cannot be dissolved by family agreement or
the repayment of bride price. The parties remain legally married until a High
Court so orders.
5.4 Islamic (Sharia) Divorce
Islamic marriages in
Nigeria — particularly in the northern states where Sharia personal law applies
— may be dissolved in several ways recognised under Islamic jurisprudence.
Talaq (Repudiation by
the Husband): The husband may pronounce talaq (divorce) three times. Under
classical Islamic law and as applied in Nigeria's Sharia courts, specific
conditions must be met: the wife must be in a state of purity; there should be
no cohabitation after the pronouncement; and the husband must be of sound mind
and acting voluntarily. The courts have been vigilant against abuse of this
form of divorce. In Nasidi v. Nasidi (Kano State Sharia Court of Appeal,
2003), the court stressed that talaq pronounced in anger or under
compulsion may not be valid.
Khul'u (Wife-Initiated
Divorce with Payment): Where the wife wishes to exit the marriage, she may
seek a khul'u by returning the mahr (dower) or other agreed payment to the
husband. This recognises the wife's right to initiate divorce, albeit with a
financial consequence.
Mubarah (Divorce by
Mutual Consent): Both parties may agree to dissolve the marriage, making
this the most straightforward form of Islamic divorce.
Faskh (Judicial
Dissolution): A wife may apply to the Sharia court for judicial dissolution
on grounds such as the husband's impotence, failure to maintain, prolonged
absence, or serious harm. This provides an important protection for wives who
cannot obtain a talaq or khul'u.
6. Child Custody and Maintenance
In all divorce proceedings
involving children, the Nigerian courts apply a paramount principle: the
welfare and best interests of the child take precedence over all other
considerations. This principle, firmly rooted in Section 71 of the
Matrimonial Causes Act and in international instruments such as the UN
Convention on the Rights of the Child (to which Nigeria is a signatory),
overrides any customary preference for the father or any other consideration.
The Supreme Court
articulated this principle with great clarity in Odogwu v. Odogwu [1992] 2
NWLR (Pt. 225) 539, holding that the court's overriding duty is to consider
what arrangement would best serve the welfare of the child, and that neither
parent has an inherent superior right to custody. The court must examine each
case on its own facts.
The courts consider a
range of factors in determining custody, including the child's age, sex,
health, emotional attachment, and the respective capacities of the parents to
provide a stable and nurturing environment. In Dike v. Dike [2000] 15 NWLR
(Pt. 689) 120, the Court of Appeal held that for young children —
particularly those below the age of seven — there is a general presumption
(though not an absolute rule) that custody should remain with the mother,
especially where the mother has been the primary caregiver.
The court distinguished
this from the position of customary law, which traditionally awards custody of
children above a certain age to the father. As the court noted in Okafor v.
Okafor [1994] 2 NWLR (Pt. 325) 1, customary practices on custody are not
determinative and must yield to the statutory welfare principle where they
conflict with it.
On the question of child
maintenance, Section 70 of the Matrimonial Causes Act empowers the court to
make orders for the financial provision of children of the marriage. Any child
under the age of 21 is automatically entitled to maintenance. In exceptional
circumstances — such as where a child is in full-time education or has a
disability — the court may extend this entitlement. Both parents bear a duty to
maintain their children according to their respective means.
7. Division of Property Upon Divorce
The division of
matrimonial property upon divorce is one of the most contentious and legally
complex aspects of Nigerian divorce law. Unlike many common law jurisdictions
(such as England and Wales, or South Africa), Nigerian courts do not have a
general power to redistribute property between divorcing spouses. The court's
powers are more limited, and this has significant implications — particularly
for financially dependent spouses.
Under Section 72 of the
Matrimonial Causes Act, the court may make orders for the settlement of
property for the benefit of the other spouse or the children of the
marriage. However, the Supreme Court in Akinbuwa v. Akinbuwa [1998] 12 NWLR
(Pt. 576) 60 confirmed that the court cannot simply redistribute property
from one spouse to another in the absence of a prior proprietary interest. The
court can only settle property that belongs to one spouse on the other — it
cannot compel a transfer of ownership without more.
The practical implications
are significant. A wife who spent years out of paid employment to raise
children and manage the home may have little to show in terms of legally
recognised ownership. In Onwuchekwa v. Onwuchekwa [1991] 5 NWLR (Pt. 194)
739, the Court of Appeal acknowledged this reality and held that
non-financial contributions to the matrimonial home — such as homemaking,
childcare, and supporting a spouse's career — may be taken into account in
determining beneficial ownership under a constructive trust. This is an
important development: it means that a wife who contributed non-financially may
be able to claim a share of property nominally registered in the husband's
name.
For property registered in
the joint names of both spouses, the starting presumption is equal ownership,
though this may be rebutted by evidence of unequal contributions. For property
registered solely in one spouse's name, the other must establish a beneficial
interest through contribution, express trust, or constructive trust.
In customary law
marriages, the position of women is often more precarious. Customary law in
many communities does not recognise a wife's independent property rights or
entitle her to a share of the husband's property upon divorce. Legal scholars
and reformers have rightly criticised this gap, and there is growing judicial
willingness to apply equitable principles to fill it.
8. Common Myths and Misconceptions
8.1 "Irreconcilable differences" are
not grounds for divorce
This is inaccurate. While
the Matrimonial Causes Act does not use the phrase "irreconcilable
differences," what it terms "irretrievable breakdown" is
substantively the same concept. If the marriage has broken down to the point
where it cannot reasonably be expected to continue, and this is evidenced by
one of the statutory facts, the court may grant a divorce.
8.2 Only the husband can cite adultery
This is false. Section
15(2)(b) of the Matrimonial Causes Act is gender-neutral. Either spouse may
petition on the ground of the other's adultery, provided the petitioner finds
continued cohabitation intolerable. The courts have consistently applied this
provision equally to husbands and wives.
8.3 Customary marriages cannot be legally
dissolved
This is incorrect.
Customary marriages can be dissolved either non-judicially (through family
agreement and repayment of bride price) or judicially (by order of a Customary
Court). In Cole v. Cole [1898] 1 NLR 15, one of the earliest Nigerian
cases on the subject, the court recognised the validity of customary law
divorce procedures.
8.4 Women have no rights in divorce cases
This is a harmful and
legally inaccurate misconception. Under the Matrimonial Causes Act, women have
clear rights to petition for divorce, seek custody of children, claim
maintenance, and assert proprietary interests in matrimonial property. In Akinbuwa
v. Akinbuwa [1998] 12 NWLR (Pt. 576) 60, the court affirmed that a wife's
contributions to the marriage — financial or otherwise — are legally
cognisable. While the law still falls short of a comprehensive property
redistribution regime, women's rights in divorce proceedings are real and
enforceable.
8.5 A marriage can be ended by oral declaration
or family ceremony
For statutory marriages,
this is entirely false. As reaffirmed in Ekanem v. Ekanem [2010]
LPELR-4063(CA), only a High Court can dissolve a statutory marriage. Any
other purported dissolution is without legal effect. This means the parties
cannot validly remarry, and any new "marriage" contracted without a
valid divorce would be void.
9. Conclusion and Recommendations for Reform
Divorce law in Nigeria is
a complex and multi-layered field, shaped by the country's rich legal
pluralism. The Matrimonial Causes Act provides a clear statutory framework for
dissolving court marriages, and the courts have developed a substantial body of
case law that fleshes out the principles governing custody, property, and
maintenance. Customary law and Islamic personal law, though less uniform,
provide recognised mechanisms for the dissolution of marriages contracted under
those systems.
Yet significant challenges
remain. The absence of a general property redistribution power leaves many
women — particularly those who have devoted themselves to the home and family —
in financial vulnerability upon divorce. The principle in Onwuchekwa v.
Onwuchekwa [1991] recognising non-financial contributions is a welcome
development, but it is not always consistently applied.
The following reforms
deserve serious consideration:
•
The Matrimonial Causes Act should be amended to
introduce a general power of equitable property distribution, taking into
account each party's contributions to the marriage — financial and
non-financial alike.
•
Customary law divorce procedures should be codified at
the state level to provide clearer protections for women, including enforceable
maintenance obligations and protection against arbitrary divorce.
•
Legal aid and public legal education should be expanded
so that Nigerians of all backgrounds are aware of their rights when a marriage
breaks down.
•
Family courts or dedicated matrimonial divisions of the
High Court should be established nationwide to improve access to justice and
ensure the consistent application of the welfare principle in child custody
disputes.
Ultimately, the law must
reflect the lived realities of Nigerian families. The reform of divorce law is
not merely a legal project — it is a social one, with profound implications for
the wellbeing of women, children, and society at large.
KEY
CASES CITED
1 Ekanem v. Ekanem [2010] LPELR-4063(CA)
2 Musa v. Musa [1998] 8 NWLR (Pt. 560) 108
3 Nwachi v. Nwachi [1995] 9 NWLR (Pt. 421) 471
4 Owusu v. Owusu [2000] 9 NWLR (Pt. 672) 232
5 Okafor v. Okafor [2007] All FWLR (Pt. 391) 1497
6 Ejike v. Ejike [1999] 9 NWLR (Pt. 620) 590
7 Sotomi v. Sotomi [1976] FNLR 215
8 Afolabi v. Afolabi [1988] LPELR-3629(SC)
9 Iyasere v. Iyasere [2005] LPELR-6930(CA)
10 Alabi v. Alabi [1956] WRNLR 79
11 Thomas v. Thomas [1941] 7 WACA 62
12 Nasidi v. Nasidi (Kano State Sharia Court of Appeal,
2003)
13 Odogwu v. Odogwu [1992] 2 NWLR (Pt. 225) 539
14 Dike v. Dike [2000] 15 NWLR (Pt. 689) 120
15 Okafor v. Okafor [1994] 2 NWLR (Pt. 325) 1
16 Akinbuwa v. Akinbuwa [1998] 12 NWLR (Pt. 576) 60
17 Onwuchekwa v. Onwuchekwa [1991] 5 NWLR (Pt. 194) 739
18 Cole v. Cole [1898] 1 NLR 15
REFERENCES
Matrimonial
Causes Act, Cap. M7, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.
Marriage
Act, Cap. M6, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.
Aekley
Solicitors, 'A Guide on Divorce Procedure in Nigeria'
<https://aekleysolicitors.com> accessed 24 December 2024.
Action4Justice
Nigeria, 'Right to Exit a Marriage' <https://nigeria.action4justice.org>
accessed 24 December 2024.
Library
of Congress, 'Nigerian Marriage and Divorce Law' (2019)
<https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/llglrdppub/2019669168/2019669168.pdf>
accessed 24 December 2024.
Classic
Attorneys, 'How To File for Divorce in Nigeria'
<https://www.classic-attorneys.com> accessed 24 December 2024.
Resolution
Law Firm, 'How to Get a Divorce in Nigeria' <https://www.resolutionlawng.com>
accessed 24 December 2024.
Edo
State Judiciary, 'Divorce — The Dissolution of a Marriage in Muslim Personal
Laws in Nigeria' (BAOBAB Legal Literacy Series)
<https://edojudiciary.gov.ng> accessed 24 December 2024.
Resolution
Law Firm, 'Divorce Settlement in Nigeria'
<https://www.resolutionlawng.com/divorce-settlement-in-nigeria/> accessed
24 December 2024.
Resolution
Law Firm, 'Child Custody After Divorce and Child Maintenance in Nigeria'
<https://www.resolutionlawng.com> accessed 24 December 2024.
SPA
Ajibade & Co, 'Child Custody in Nigeria: A Fallout of Irretrievable
Breakdown of Marriages' <https://spaajibade.com> accessed 24 December
2024.
PER
Journal, 'Property Rights of Nigerian Women at Divorce: A Case for a
Redistribution Order' (2021)
<https://perjournal.co.za/article/view/5306/9841> accessed 24 December
2024.
LawPavilion
Blog, 'The Rights of Woman Over Family Properties in Divorce Cases'
<https://lawpavilion.com/blog> accessed 24 December 2024.
Edo
State Judiciary, 'Grounds for Termination of Customary Marriages in Nigeria'
<https://edojudiciary.gov.ng> accessed 24 December 2004.
Comments
Post a Comment